Skip Navigation

Holocaust and Genocide Studies 1988 3(2):197-208; doi:10.1093/hgs/3.2.197
© 1988 by United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by FACKENHEIM, E. L.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

HOLOCAUST AND WELTANSCHAUUNG: PHILOSOPHICAL REFLECTIONS ON WHY THEY DID IT*

EMIL L. FACKENHEIM

Jerusalem

This essay broaches the most important and heretofore unanswered question of the Holocaust: ‘Why did they do it?’ Positivist and Idealist theories of history both fail to answer the ‘big’ question and lead to the untenable explanation of insanity. The answer seems to lie in the Nazi Weltanschauung, whose ‘granitelike’ core was the Jews. They lent the Weltanschauung its comprehensive unity and were its cosmic principle. An understanding of the importance of Weltanschauung in modern German history and philosophy is necessary to understanding the victory of the Nazi Weltanschauung in Germany.


*Also to be presented at the ‘Remembering for the Future’ Conference, Oxford, 10–13 July 1988.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?




Disclaimer: Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.