Skip Navigation

Holocaust and Genocide Studies 1989 4(2):127-148; doi:10.1093/hgs/4.2.127
© 1989 by United States Holocaust Memorial Museum
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Add to My Personal Archive
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow Request Permissions
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by KATZ, S. T.
Right arrow Search for Related Content
Social Bookmarking
 Add to CiteULike   Add to Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us  
What's this?


Articles

‘Genocide in the 20th Century’

ESSAY: QUANTITY AND INTERPRETATION — ISSUES IN THE COMPARATIVE HISTORICAL ANALYSIS OF THE HOLOCAUST*

STEVEN T. KATZ

Comell University New York

This essay attempts to situate the Shoah as an historical phenomenon by comparing it to six other well known instances of persecution: (1) the witch hysteria of the 15th–17th centuries; (2)the destruction of North American Indians; (3)the history of Black Slavery in America; (4) the Nazi persecution of Gypsies; (5) of Homosexuals; and (6) other Eastern European groups. The objective of the study is to distinguish the phenomenological characteristics of these various cases of oppression and mass murder so as to facilitate more responsible and accurate judgements regarding them as such as well as vis-à-vis the Holocaust. Contra all too common simplistic conclusions regarding the comparability and similarity of these events to each other and to the destruction of European Jews the present paper argues that fundamental distinctions, elemental differences, mark off the Holocaust phenomenologically from these other, similarly immoral and abhorrent, cases.


*This is a revised version of the paper presented at the ‘Remembering for the Future’ Conference, Oxford, 10–13 July 1988.


Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us    What's this?


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Current SociologyHome page
Bibliography
Current Sociology, March 1, 1990; 38(1): 113 - 126.




Disclaimer:
Please note that abstracts for content published before 1996 were created through digital scanning and may therefore not exactly replicate the text of the original print issues. All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy, but the Publisher will not be held responsible for any remaining inaccuracies. If you require any further clarification, please contact our Customer Services Department.